Tag Archives: SMH

response: regarding “Green ideas must take blame for deaths” (12th February)

 to me

show details 5:10 PM (2 hours ago)
Reply
Dear Kelly,

Recently you contacted ReaderLink. The following outlines The Herald’s response:

Miranda Devine’s articles appear in The Herald’s opinion pages, and like all our opinion pieces her article is intended to stimulate debate and discussion among our readers. Much of this debate takes place in the daily Letters pages.
To respond to Herald opinion pieces you needs to send your comments to: letters@smh.com.au .

Your interest in Herald Publications is appreciated and has provided us with valuable feedback.
Please quote 00138031 if you wish to contact ReaderLink again.

Regards,
Justine & Ben

Contact us:
readerlink@mail.fairfax.com.au
02 9282 1569
9.00 am – 3.00 pm Monday to Friday (except public holidays)

Kelly Tall

 to Reader

show details 7:21 PM (2 minutes ago)
Reply
(Apologies I pressed send too soon – )

Dear Justine and Ben

“Your interest in Herald Publications is appreciated and has provided us with valuable feedback.
Please quote 00138031 if you wish to contact Rea
derLink again”


I am telling you I am never buying anything from Fairfax or visiting another Fairfax website because of an offensive article. 

Her article was NOT designed to stimulate any debate and discussion, it was to INFLAME it and promote hatred.
She was calling for a group to be lynched. 
This is irresponsible.  
It is journalism at it’s worst.
It is not what I expected from the Sydney Morning Herald.
This is a tragedy and shocking that you would allow this to be printed in response to this tragedy
You are not the tabloid in this market so why are you acting like it? 
Do you have a standard response you always say about Miranda Devine’s articles? 
Do your editors care at all about how disgusting her piece was, or are they happy about all the anger and hatred she has stirred up, the hits it has probably driven to your website which in turn gives you something nice to tell the advertisers?
I don’t care about the letter pages. I want YOU to know you have lost a reader. 

Kind regards
Kelly Tall

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

regarding “Green ideas must take blame for deaths” (12th February)

 to; letters@smh.com.au, readerlink@smh.com.au

cc; devinemiranda@hotmail.com

subject: regarding “Green ideas must take blame for deaths” (12th February)

Sir / Madam

After your publication of Miranda Devine’s opinion piece “Green ideas must take blame for deaths” (12th February) I will not be visiting your website, nor buying a copy of The Sydney Morning Herald ever again.

While I understand this was an “opinion” piece I feel it was very poor judgment by the Sydney Morning Herald Editors to publish a piece so clearly designed to stir up and promote hatred, set against such a tragic and horrible event. People are already confused, angry and saddened by what has happened. It was irresponsible and insensitive to lay claim to an such a simplistic answer on who is to blame now, and in the manner that Devine did.

“It is not arsonists who should be hanging from lamp-posts but greenies.”  I cannot believe any paper would publish this at any time, let alone less than a week after what your own journalists have described as one of our country’s greatest tragedies. Devine has conveniently left out the environmental factors contributing to that day (extremely high temperatures and strong winds) and lay blame at the foot of environmentalists without any real facts to back up her argument.

While Ms Devine remains in your employment, and you still allow her to write such inflammatory and insensitive “opinion pieces”  I no longer wish to have anything to do with your publication, or indeed anything to do with any of Fairfax Limited’s associated entities.

Kind Regards

Kelly Tall

Leave a comment

Filed under random

Will someone shut this woman up?

The morning after Obama’s victory, when any sane person was skipping their way to work, in wonderment that good stuff still really can happen, Miranda Devine gave us this; a stupid segway about Obama smoking pot. While most where writing about what this election meant, the things it signalled, the challenges that the new administration faced, the impact on Australia – and OK the freaking dog… not our Miranda.  She wanted to remind us that Obama had taken drugs.  She swaddled this story then in one of her typical “outrage” puff-pieces, but the ultimate outtake – the guy who just had an extraordinary victory, the first black president of the USA, once used to be a toker.  

She also bought us this intelligent and provocative piece about how disingenuous feminists were for not wanting Palin to become vice-president. (Um, how about because she was THICK AND DANGEROUS?).

She was also at the heart of the Henson hysteria (one here). David Marr commented on Lateline that people like Devine only have an audience now via issues such as “your kids aren’t safe”.  Devine and her ilk are losing relevance, but this is still the one way to really freak people out.

What I do not understand is how Devine was plucked from the Daily Telegraph and taken to the SMH? Was it to get a balance of opinion? Was it to get SMH readers in a flap?

She is a shock jock in print – instead of acknowledging the world is complex, and things are not black and white, she plays on life’s uncertainties, amplifying them;  she makes them more real and shocking, happening on your corner,  in your school, in your home.  She offers nothing intelligent to a debate. She shuts it down.

I wish I could find a link to an article I read not long after An Inconvenient Truth first came out. She complained that changing light bulbs was not the answer – this I agree with her. We need to do more. But Devine’s objection was linked to the quality of light that comes from a fluoro bulb. Incandescent provided much “warmer” light, and she was upset that this would be replaced by the harsher light of the more enviro friendly fluoro bulb.  

How can we rid the SMH pages of her?  How can we get Devine to shut her trap in the same way her brain seems to be closed?  I’d continue to complain about her to the SMH, but I feel this probabaly only fuels her power there.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized